Skip to content

No train, no gain



Last week I wrote a post about potential changes in the world economy and labour market.  The ideas were later built on by Rick at Flippchart Fairytales, Gareth Jones at Inside my Head and then Michael Carty as part of a broader review at XpertHR.  Elsewhere there were also comments about doom mongering.

But these topics need a lot more debate.  If HR is really step up to the plate then it needs to start tackle the big subjects, the ones outside of its immediate span of control.  Sure if you want to sit in the corner talking about the next iteration of your performance review form and competency model, good luck to you.  I think it is referred to as rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. And stretching the metaphor beyond what is reasonable, would you say the person that shouted, “Iceberg!” was a doom monger?

So I was thinking how to unpack some of the themes in the original post and then yesterday I had an appointment with my physiotherapist.  As she was pummeling my shoulder into oblivion we were talking about work the future and pensions.  She was recounting to me a conversation she had with her father about how she was cashing in her savings and investing in professional development.  Her father’s response had been one of caution, but as she explained to me, the competitive advantage and financial benefit should we reap through this was greater than the return that she was getting on her savings.

This seemed to me to epitomise one of the points that I made about development,

With the speed of development, who is going to train and skill or workforce? Universities? Colleges? Where the information they learn in the first year is our of date before the third year. When continuous learning and development really is critical to business success, who is going to pay? And what will they want in return?

A physio is a classic example of the sort of knowledge worker that I believe we will see more and more of within our economy.  Mobile, normally self-employed, highly skilled and gaining advantage through those skills.  They can choose to work when they want and as they need and follow demand.  At the same time, of course, there is insecurity, high levels of personal investment and the need for constant continuous professional development.  But then, couldn’t that apply to a number of other roles in the future? Even HR?

Ok, so I’m not saying that EVERYONE will be self-employed or employed on short-term contracts, there will be a core of directly employed workers. But even that will see a complete paradigm shift. If knowledge is key, if skills development is changing at a pace, then who will skill those workers and at what cost? Is the alternative to the freelance, portfolio career in essence a form of bonded labour?

These are the debates that the HR community needs to be starting, needs to lead. You may think this sounds extreme, but if you went back even thirty years and suggested that in the future large numbers of employees would be employed on fixed term contracts, that there would be “agency workers” and that pensions would almost be a thing of the past…..well, people would have probably laughed in your face too.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. 07/14/2010 15:08

    Phew – how far out of the box do you want to think, HRD and co? It’s been pointed out by quite a few people that we are completely ignoring the implications of peak flow as if global warming was the only disaster on the horizon the world had to worry about. Who controls oil supply and prices has been worrying the US since the 1970s oil crisis so it’s hard to see how this won’t have an impact on the economies of developing countries or our national security. What are the implications for off-shoring, for the knowledge and technology based economies (or the educated people in them)and er… Twitter? Will we rationed to one or two tweets a day? As for HR, has it ever had a remit to look beyond people resourcing issues and legal compliance? Or is that a silly question?

  2. BJH permalink
    07/15/2010 13:27

    I’m really surprised by Noel’s comment above: “As for HR, has it ever had a remit to look beyond people resourcing issues and legal compliance? Or is that a silly question?”

    I never considered myself restrained in my remit to advise and discuss with the business. I’ve worked across a number of organisations and seen many successes and failures. I’ve happily shared the benefit of my experience, even if it wasn’t focussed on people resourcing or legal compliance.

    It’s like saying a Finance Director shouldn’t give their views on people issues.

    Is it just me … ?

  3. 07/26/2010 13:26

    @Noel O’Reilly- I guess my challenge to the HR profession would be to not wait for a remit and to start bangin on about the issues that are likely to impact business in the coming 10 years. As for rationing tweets….I’m all for that!

    @BJH – That is what makes you a great professional. Sadly, too many people do wait for a remit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: